%1

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment proposes to establish specific regulatory levels posing no significant risk for benz[a]anthracene, benzene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[j]fluoranthene, bromoform, chrysene, 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, dibenzo[a,h]pyrene, dibenzo[a,i]pyrene, and 5-methylchrysene and to establish a specific regulatory level representing 1/1000th the observable effect for arsenic.

NSRLs and MADLs adopted as of February 2008.

After a chemical is added to the Proposition 65 list, OEHHA as a general practice will strive to develop and release for public comment a draft safe harbor level within one year of the chemical’s listing.

Approved amendment to Title 27, California Code of Regulations, section 25705(b)(1), that adopt 8.2 micrograms per day as the No Significant Risk Level for 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) for purposes of Proposition 65.

OEHHA proposal to adopt a NSRL of 8.2ug/day for 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene

Proposal to establish a NSRL of 11 ug/day for Imazalil

 A No Significant Risk Level for imazalil of 11 micrograms per day was adopted effective April 25, 2012.

Proposal to add a NSRL for imazalil of 11ug/day.

A notice to establish a specific regulatory level posing no significant risk for imazalil was posted on the OEHHA website and published in the CRNR on September 9, 2011. OEHHA is withdrawing that notice because a number of non-substantive, clarifying changes to the notice were required.

Adoption of 0.54 micrograms per day as the No Significant Risk Level for glycidol for purposes of Proposition 65.