Notice of Intent to List Chemicals: Estrogen–progestogen (combined) used as menopausal therapy, Etoposide, Etoposide in combination with cisplatin and bleomycin, Methyl isobutyl ketone, MOPP (vincristine-prednisone-nitrogen mustard-procarbazine mixture)

The California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) intends to list the chemicals identified in the table below as known to the State to cause cancer under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. The Act, commonly known as Proposition 65, is codified in Health and Safety Code section 25249.5 et seq. This action is being taken pursuant to the Labor Code mechanism contained in Health and Safety Code section 25249.8(a).


Chemical

CAS No.

Endpoint

Reference

Estrogen–progestogen (combined) used as menopausal therapy

--

Cancer

IARC (2011a,b)

Etoposide

33419-42-0

Cancer

IARC (2011a,b)

Etoposide in combination with cisplatin and bleomycin

--

Cancer

IARC (2011a,b)

Methyl isobutyl ketone

108-10-1

Cancer

IARC (2011b);
Grosse et al. (2011)

MOPP (vincristine-prednisone-nitrogen mustard-procarbazine mixture)

113803-47-7

Cancer

IARC (2011a,b)

Background on listing by the Labor Code mechanism:  Health and Safety Code section 25249.8(a) incorporates California Labor Code Sections 6382(b)(1) and 6382(d) into Proposition 65. The law requires that certain substances identified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) be listed as known to cause cancer under Proposition 65. Labor Code section 6382(b)(1) refers to substances identified by IARC as human or animal carcinogens. Labor Code section 6382(d) refers to substances identified by IARC as carcinogens or potential carcinogens. Information regarding carcinogenicity classifications by IARC may be found at the following URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Preamble/CurrentPreamble.pdf (IARC Preamble).

As the lead agency for the implementation of Proposition 65, OEHHA evaluates whether listing under Proposition 65 is required.

OEHHA’s determination:  Estrogen-progestogen (combined) used as menopausal therapy, etoposide, etoposide in combination with cisplatin and bleomycin, methyl isobutyl ketone, and MOPP (vincristine-prednisone-nitrogen mustard-procarbazine mixture) each meet the requirements for listing as known to the state to cause cancer for the purposes of Proposition 65.

In 2011, IARC published Volume 100A of its series, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans(IARC, 2011a). IARC concluded that:

  • Estrogen–progestogen (combined) used as menopausal therapy is “carcinogenic to humans” (Group 1)
  • Etoposide is “carcinogenic to humans” (Group 1)
  • Etoposide in combination with cisplatin and bleomycin is “carcinogenic to humans” (Group 1)
  • MOPP is “carcinogenic to humans” (Group 1)

IARC has also published on its website a list entitled “Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1-102” (IARC, 2011b). There, IARC concludes that methyl isobutyl ketone is classified in Group 2B (the agent is “possibly carcinogenic to humans”). IARC also concluded that there is “sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals” for this agent (Grosse et al., 2011).

Therefore, these substances meet the requirements of both Labor Code sections 6382(b)(1) and (d).

Opportunity for comment:  OEHHA is committed to public participation in its implementation of Proposition 65. OEHHA is providing this opportunity to comment as to whether the chemicals identified above meet the requirements for listing as causing cancer specified in Health and Safety Code section 25249.8(a). Because these are ministerial listings, comments should be limited to whether IARC has identified the specific chemical or substance as a known or potential human or animal carcinogen. Under this listing mechanism, OEHHA cannot consider scientific arguments concerning the weight or quality of the evidence considered by IARC when identifying a specific chemical or substance and will not respond to such comments if they are submitted.

OEHHA must receive comments by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, October 17, 2011. We encourage you to submit comments in electronic form, rather than in paper form. Comments transmitted by e-mail should be addressed to sam.delson@oehha.ca.gov. Comments submitted in paper form may be mailed, faxed, or delivered in person to the address below. A public workshop will be held only upon request. Such request must be made in writing to the address below within 10 days from the publication of this notice:

Mailing Address:
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
P.O. Box 4010, MS-19B
Sacramento, California 95812-4010
Fax: (916) 323-8803
Street Address: 1001 I Street
Sacramento, California 95814

If you have any questions, please contact Sam Delson at (916) 445-6900.

Footnotes and References

Grosse Y, Baan R, Secretan-Lauby B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Islami F, Galichet L, Straif K, on behalf of the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group (2011). Carcinogenicity of chemicals in industrial and consumer products, food contaminants and flavourings, and water chlorination byproducts. Lancet Oncology 12(4):328-9. [URL: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2811%2970088-2/fulltext].

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 2011a). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. A Review of Human Carcinogens: Pharmaceuticals. Volume 100A. World Health Organization. Lyon, France. [Available at URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100A/index.php].

IARC (2011b). International Agency for Research on Cancer. Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1-102. [Available at URL: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/ClassificationsAlphaOrder.pdf].