Comment Submissions - Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Amendments to Article 6, Clear and Reasonable Warnings Short-form Warnings

Comment by: 
anonymous
Received on: 
03/08/2021 - 2:11pm
Comment: 
I do not support adding additional requirements to the existing Prop 65 rule. I think the public has a great general knowledge of what the prop is for. There would be little to no knowledge of the health aspects of individual/specific elements or chemicals. Listing them out, may have a detrimental effect, with some people 'thinking' they know what any dangers might be and thus not actually take the proper cautions. I think this also puts an undue burden on the company to try and list every chemical possible or that is potentially bad. How long or big could this list get, etc? I think that for the company's best interest as well as for consumer awareness, keeping the current status quo is perfectly fine and possibly more beneficial for the consumers in the end. Allow them to be alerted and then allow them to find out more for that particular product or company on their own if they so choose to do so.