Comment Submissions - Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Amendments to Article 6, Clear and Reasonable Warnings Short-form Warnings

I vote for the current short version, not the newly promoted one which requires specific chemical names. I think the current short-version, without a specific chemical name, is more than sufficient to serve the purpose of warning people the potential risk. I do understand and agree that manufactures and distributors in the US bear the responsibility of proper warning on product and catalog/website, but adding a specific chemical will cause huge increase of workload on our side, because we manufacture/distribute products, not raw materials. And harmful chemicals are usually contained in the raw material, it is very difficult for us to find out all chemicals included in the raw material, since our raw materials are purchased from elsewhere. I strongly against to use the newly proposed short-form warning. Doing business is already hard enough under special times like right now, please keep the warning format as it is, and stop adding more pressure and workload to us. Thank you so much.