|
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: David P. Spath, Ph.D., Chief
Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management Branch
Department of Health Services
601 North 7th Street, Mail Stop 92
P.O. Box 942732
Sacramento, California 94234-7320
VIA: George V. Alexeeff, Ph.D., DABT
Deputy Director for Scientific Affairs
VIA: Anna M. Fan, Ph.D., Chief
Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Section
FROM: Robert A. Howd, Ph.D., Chief
Water Toxicology Unit
DATE: June 7, 2000
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ACTION LEVEL FOR 2-CHLOROTOLUENE
As you requested in your memorandum of January 5, 2000, we reviewed
your department's proposed action level for 2-chlorotoluene in drinking
water. We concur with your proposed level of 140 ug/L, based on
a subchronic rat study by Gibson et al. (1974).
2-Chlorotoluene is also known as ortho-chlorotoluene and 2-chloro-1-methyl
benzene. At 20oC, this chemical is a liquid with a vapor
pressure of 2.7 Torr and a water solubility of 0.377 g/L. This compound
is used as a solvent and a chemical intermediate in the manufacture
of pesticides, dyes, and pharmaceuticals (U.S. EPA, 1985). Because
of its vapor pressure, the chemical will typically exist in the
vapor phase in the atmosphere. If released to water, a river model
volatilization half-life is 3.4 hours with adsorption to suspended
solids and sediments another favored fate. The compound is not likely
to undergo hydrolysis or significantly bioaccumulate in aquatic
organisms (HSDB, 2000).

Quistad et al. (1983) examined metabolism of 2-chlorotoluene in
rats. 2-Chlorotoluene is quickly absorbed into blood. Following
a single, 1 mg/kg-day oral dose of [14C] 2-chlorotoluene,
85-92 percent and five to eight percent of the administered 14C
were respectively recovered in the urine and feces. The major urinary
metabolites, along with the ranges of relative percentages reported,
were: (1) a glycine conjugate of 2-chlorobenzoic acid, 20-23 percent;
(2) a ß-glucuronide of 2-chlorobenzyl alcohol, 35-42 percent;
and (3) a mercapturic acid, 13-21percent (ACGIH, 1980).
The health and toxicity data available for 2-chlorotoluene are
limited. 2-Chlorotoluene has a relatively low animal acute oral
toxicity in (newborn) rats of >1600 mg/kg-day and in mice of
2500 mg/kg-day (IRIS, 2000). Sublethal acute effects in rats include
moderate to marked weakness and vasodilation (ACGIH, 1980). There
are several subchronic studies and no chronic studies available.
Gibson and associates (1974a) studied the toxicity of daily doses
of 2-chlorotoluene in the dog. Sixteen beagles of each sex were
divided into four groups, consisting of 5, 20, and 80 mg/kgbw-day
2-chlorotoluene and a fourth group given 5 percent aqueous acacia
(0.5 mg/kgbw-day) as a vehicle control. Daily doses were
administered by capsule. Treatment for male and female dogs was
for 96 and 95 days, respectively. No treatment-related changes in
body weight or effects on hematology, clinical biochemistry, or
urinalysis occurred. Examinations included hematocrit, hemoglobin,
red blood cells, white blood cells, prothrombin time, platelets,
mean corpuscular volume, calcium, serum glucose, blood urea nitrogen,
total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and serum glutamic oxaloacetic
transaminase. There were no treatment-related effects on organ weights.
For dogs receiving 5, 20, and 80 mg/kgbw-day 2-chlorotoluene
there were no differences observed compared to controls, and the
no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) in the study was 80 mg/kgbw-day.
Gibson et al. (1974b) examined the subchronic effects of daily
oral doses of 2-chlorotoluene in the rat. For this study, weanling
Harlan rats (about 125 grams each) were divided into four groups
of 20 rodents/sex. Daily, for 103 or 104 days, animals were given
0, 20, 80, or 320 mg/kg-day 2-chlorotoluene via gavage. Hematological
data such as hemoglobin, red blood cell count, white blood cell
count, prothrombin times, blood urea nitrogen, and blood glucose
were determined. At autopsy, weights of liver, kidney, spleen, heart,
thyroid, adrenal, and prostate and testes or uterus and ovaries
were determined. Histopathologic examinations were performed on
colon, duodenum, ileum, jejunum, lungs, lymph nodes, mammary, pancreas,
parathyroid, salivary glands, skin, stomach, striated muscle, thymus,
and urinary bladder. The authors noticed the following differences
from the controls. In males, while the mean body weight did not
differ from the controls at 20 mg/kg-day (the study no-observed-adverse-effect-level
[NOAEL]), the mean body weights for males were significantly lower
at the 80 and 320 mg/kg-day levels. Further, and also in males,
statistically significant increases in the adrenal weights of the
80 and 320 mg/kg-day dose groups were observed (the study LOAEL).
No significant differences were observed for females. On the basis
of this study's findings of statistically significant differences
in body weight and adrenal weight for male rats at the 80 mg/kg-day
level (LOAEL), the 20 mg/kg-day dose level is used as the NOAEL
to calculate the action level.
The 20 mg/kg-day NOAEL is identical to that proposed in your memorandum.
We would add only a mention of significant adrenal weight gains
at the LOAEL of 80 mg/kg-day to the justification for derivation
of the NOAEL. The public health protective level "C" is
then calculated as follows:
C = NOAEL x BW x RSC / UF x DWC =
health protective value in mg/L
where,
NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect-level, 20 mg/kg-day as the absence
of body weight decrease and adrenal weight increase in male rats,
BW = adult human body weight, 70 kg (default value),
RSC = relative source contribution, 0.2 (default value)
UF = uncertainty factor of 1000 (10-fold for inter-species variation,
10-fold for human variability, 10-fold to account for the use of
a subchronic study for determining a lifetime value), and
DWC = adult drinking water consumption, 2 L/day (default).
Accordingly,
C = 20 mg/kg-day x 70 kg x 0.2 / 1000 x 2 L/day =
0.14 mg/L = 140 ug/L
Based on the health protective concentration calculated, the Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment recommends and supports
an action level of 140 ppb (ug/L) for o-chlorotoluene in drinking
water. Should you have any questions about this review, please contact
me at (510) 622-3168.
References
ACGIH (1971. Documentation of the threshold limit value for substances
in workroom air. American Conference of Government and Industrial
Hygienists.
Gibson, WR; Gossett, FO; Koenig, GR; Marroqine F (1974a). The toxicity
of oral daily doses of o-chlorotoluene in the dog. Toxicology Division,
Lily Research Laboratories, Submitted to the Test Rules Development
Branch, Office of Toxic Substances, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.
Gibson, WR; Gossett, FO; Koenig, GR; Marroquin F (1974b). The toxicity
of oral daily doses of o-chlorotoluene in the rat. Toxicology Division,
Lilly Research Laboratories, Submitted to the Test Rules Development
Branch, Office of Toxic Substances, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.
HSDB (2000). Hazardous Substance Data Bank, National Library of
Medicine, National Institutes of Heath. Available on line at http://sis.nlm.nih.gov.
IRIS (2000). U.S. EPA, Integrated risk management system substance
file - o-chlorotoluene. Available on line at http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm/iris/subst0412.htm.
Quistad GB, Mulholland KM, Jamieson GC (1983). 2-Chlorotoluene
metabolism by rats. J Agric Food Chem 31(6):1158-62.
U.S. EPA (1985). Health and Environmental Effects Profile for Chlorotoluene
(o-, m-, p-). Prepared by the Office of Health and Environmental
Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati,
Ohio for the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington,
DC.
|