|
Title 22, California Code of Regulations
Amendment to Section 12705.
Specific Regulatory Levels Posing No Significant Risk
Amendment to Section 12805.
Specific Regulatory Levels: Reproductive Toxicants
(Follow this
link to download the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking as a pdf file)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment proposes to establish specific regulatory levels posing
no significant risk for chloroethane; di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
(DEHP); lead; lead acetate; lead phosphate; lead subacetate; methylhydrazine;
methylhydrazine sulfate; 5-morpholinomethyl-3-[(5-nitrofurfurylidene)-amino]-2-oxazolidinone;
MX (3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone); phenylhydrazine;
phenylhydrazine hydrochloride; polygeenan; carbazole; MeIQ (2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline);
MeIQx(2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline); methyl carbamate;
4-(N-nitrosomethylamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone; and trimethyl
phosphate and amend Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Section
12705(b), 12705(c)(2) and 12705(d), and to establish specific regulatory
levels having no observable effect for arsenic (inorganic oxides),
benzene, cadmium, and quizalofop ethyl and amend Title 22, California
Code of Regulations, Section 12805.
PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS
A public hearing will be held on July 23, 2001, at
which time any person may present statements or arguments orally
or in writing relevant to the action described in this notice. The
public hearing will commence at 10:00 a.m. in the Coastal Hearing
Room, California Environmental Protection Agency Building, 1001
I Street, 2nd Floor, Sacramento, California and will last until
all business has been conducted, or until 5:00 p.m.
Any written statements or arguments regardless of
the form or method of transmission must be received by OEHHA by
5:00 p.m. on July 23, 2001, which is hereby designated as the close
of the written comment period.
Written comments regarding this proposed action can
be sent by mail or by fax addressed to:
Susan Luong
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
Proposition 65 Implementation Program
P. O. Box 4010
Sacramento, California 95812-4010
FAX: (916) 323-8803
Telephone: (916) 445-6900
Comments sent by courier should be delivered to:
Susan Luong
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
1001 I Street, 19th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Comments may also be transmitted via email addressed
to: (sluong@oehha.ca.gov).
It is requested but not required that written statements
or arguments be submitted in triplicate.
CONTACT
Please direct inquiries concerning processing of the
action described in this notice to Susan Luong or Cynthia Oshita,
in writing at the address given above, or by telephone at (916)
445-6900. Inquiries concerning the substance of the action may be
directed to Colleen Heck, Chief Counsel, in writing at the address
given above, or by telephone at (916) 324-2831.
INFORMATIVE DIGEST/POLICY STATEMENT OVERVIEW
The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act
of 1986, commonly known as Proposition 65 (hereinafter referred
to as "the Act"), prohibits a person in the course of
doing business from knowingly and intentionally exposing any individual
to a chemical that has been listed as known to cause cancer or reproductive
toxicity without first giving clear and reasonable warning to such
individual (Health and Safety Code Section 25249.6). The Act also
prohibits such persons from knowingly discharging a listed chemical
into water or onto or into land where such chemicals pass or probably
will pass into any source of drinking water (Health
and Safety Code Section 25249.5).
For chemicals known to the State to cause cancer,
an exemption from the above requirements is provided by the Act
when a person in the course of doing business is able to demonstrate
that an exposure for which he or she is responsible poses no significant
risk or that a discharge which otherwise complies with all applicable
requirements would not cause any significant amount of the discharged
or released chemical to enter any source of drinking water (Health
and Safety Code Sections 25249.9 and 25249.10). A determination
that a level of exposure poses no significant risk may be made utilizing
regulations that have previously been adopted by the Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment (22 CCR Sections 12701-12721). Section
12701 describes alternative methods for making such a determination.
Section 12705 sets forth the process by which the Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment may identify specific regulatory levels
for determining "no significant risk" for purposes of
Proposition 65.
For chemicals known to the State to cause reproductive
toxicity, an exemption from the warning requirement and discharge
prohibition discussed above is provided by the Act when a person
in the course of doing business can demonstrate that an exposure
for which he or she is responsible produces no observable effect,
assuming exposure at 1,000 times the level in question, or a discharge
which otherwise complies with all applicable requirements would
not cause any significant amount of the discharged or released chemical
to enter any source of drinking water (Health and Safety Code Sections
25249.9 and 25249.10). One method by which a person in the course
of doing business may determine whether an exposure or a discharge
is exempt from the Act is by application of the specific regulatory
level for the chemical in Section 12805. The levels in Section 12805
represent the maximum dose level at which the chemical has no observable
reproductive effect, given an exposure at one thousand (1,000) times
the level in question.
This amendment to Section 12705(b) would adopt the
following "no significant risk" levels for chemicals listed
as known to cause cancer:
| Chemical |
NSRL, in units
micrograms per day
|
|
| Chloroethane |
150
|
|
| Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) |
300
|
|
| Lead |
15 (oral)
|
|
| Lead acetate |
23 (oral)
|
|
| Lead phosphate |
58 (oral)
|
|
| Lead subacetate |
41 (oral)
|
|
| Methylhydrazine |
0.058 (oral)
0.090 (inhalation)
|
|
| Methylhydrazine sulfate |
0.18
|
|
| 5-morpholinomethyl-3[(5-nitrofurfurylidene)-amino]-2-oxazolidinone |
0.18
|
|
| MX (3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone) |
0.11
|
|
| Phenylhydrazine |
1.0
|
|
| Phenylhydrazine hydrochloride |
1.4
|
|
| Polygeenan |
1200
|
|
The amendment to Section 12705(d) would adopt the
following "no significant risk" levels for chemicals listed
as known to cause cancer:
| Chemical |
NSRL, in units
micrograms per day
|
|
| Carbazole |
4.1
|
|
| MeIQ (2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline) |
0.46
|
|
| MeIQx (2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline |
0.41
|
|
| Methyl carbamate |
160
|
|
| 4-(N-Nitrosomethylamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone |
0.014
|
|
| Trimethyl phosphate |
24
|
|
The amendment to Section 12805 would adopt the following
regulatory levels for chemicals known to the state to cause reproductive
toxicity:
| Chemical |
MADL, in units
micrograms per day
|
|
| Arsenic (inorganic oxides) |
220
|
|
| Benzene |
24 (oral)
49 (inhalation)
|
|
| Cadmium |
4.1
|
|
| Quizalofop ethyl |
590
|
|
The risk assessments which were used by the Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment to determine the stated
levels are as follows:
(Click a link below to download the document as
a pdf file)
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000a). No Significant
Risk Level (NSRL) for the Proposition 65 Carcinogen Chloroethane.
OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, California
Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland, May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000b). No Significant
Risk Level (NSRL) for the Proposition 65 Carcinogen Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
(DEHP). OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section,
California Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland, May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000c). No Significant
Risk Level (NSRLs) for the Proposition 65 Carcinogens Lead and Lead
Compounds (Oral). OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment
Section, California Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland, May
2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000d). No Significant
Risk Level (NSRLs) for the Proposition 65 Carcinogens Methylhydrazine
and Methylhydrazine Sulfate. OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard
Assessment Section, California Environmental Protection Agency,
Oakland, May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000e). No Significant
Risk Level (NSRL) for the Proposition 65 Carcinogen 5-Morpholinomethyl-3-[(5-nitrofurfurylidene)-amino]-2-oxazolidinone.
OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, California
Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland, May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000f). No Significant
Risk Level (NSRL) for the Proposition 65 Carcinogen MX (3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone).
OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, California
Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland, May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000g). No Significant
Risk Levels (NSRLs) for the Proposition 65 Carcinogens Phenylhydrazine
and Phenylhydrazine Hydrochloride. OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer
Hazard Assessment Section, California Environmental Protection Agency,
Oakland, May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000h). No Significant
Risk Level (NSRL) for the Proposition 65 Carcinogen Polygeenan.
OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, California
Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland, May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000i). Expedited
Cancer Potency Values and No Significant Risk Levels (NSRLs) for
Six Proposition 65 Carcinogens: Carbazole, MeIQ, MeIQx, Methylcarbamate,
4-Nitrosomethylamino-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, and Trimethyl phosphate.
OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, California
Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland, May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000j). Proposition
65 Maximum Allowable Daily Level (MADL) for Reproductive Toxicity
for Arsenic (inorganic oxides). OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer
Hazard Assessment Section, California Environmental Protection Agency,
Sacramento, May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000k). Proposition
65 Maximum Allowable Daily Level (MADL) for Reproductive Toxicity
for Benzene. OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment
Section, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento,
May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000l). Proposition
65 Maximum Allowable Daily Level (MADL) for Reproductive Toxicity
for Cadmium. OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment
Section, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento,
May 2001.
Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2000m). Proposition
65 Maximum Allowable Daily Level (MADL) for Reproductive Toxicity
for Quizaolofop Ethyl. OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard
Assessment Section, California Environmental Protection Agency,
Sacramento, May 2001.
AUTHORITY
Health and Safety Code Section 25249.12.
REFERENCE
Health and Safety Code Sections 25249.5, 25249.6,
25249.9, 25249.10 and 25249.11.
IMPACT ON LOCAL AGENCIES OR SCHOOL DISTRICTS
OEHHA has determined the proposed regulatory action
would not pose a mandate on local agencies or school districts nor
does it require reimbursement by the State pursuant to Part 7 (commencing
with Section 17500) of Division 4 of the Government Code. The Office
of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has also determined that
no nondiscretionary costs or savings to local agencies or school
districts will result from the proposed regulatory action.
COSTS OR SAVINGS TO STATE AGENCIES
OEHHA has determined that no savings or increased
costs to any State agency will result from the proposed regulatory
action.
EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDING TO THE STATE
OEHHA has determined that no costs or savings in federal
funding to the State will result from the proposed regulatory action.
EFFECT ON HOUSING COSTS
OEHHA has determined that the proposed regulatory
action will have no effect on housing costs.
SIGNIFICANT STATEWIDE ADVERSE ECONOMIC IMPACT DIRECTLY
AFFECTING BUSINESS, INCLUDING ABILITY TO COMPETE
OEHHA has made an initial determination that the adoption
of the regulation will not have a significant statewide adverse
economic impact directly affecting businesses, including the ability
of California businesses to compete with businesses in other states.
IMPACT ON THE CREATION, ELIMINATION, OR EXPANSION
OF JOBS/BUSINESSES
OEHHA has determined that the proposed regulatory
action will not have any impact on the creation or elimination of
jobs, the creation of new businesses or the elimination of existing
businesses, or the expansion of businesses currently doing business
within the State of California.
COST IMPACTS ON REPRESENTATIVE PRIVATE PERSONS OR
BUSINESSES
OEHHA is not aware of any cost impacts that a representative
private person or business would necessarily incur in reasonable
compliance with the proposed action.
EFFECT ON SMALL BUSINESSES
OEHHA has determined that the proposed regulation
does not affect small business as the term is defined by Government
Code Section 11342.610 since Proposition 65 does not apply to businesses
with fewer than ten employees.
CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES
In accordance with Government Code Section 11346.5(a)(13),
OEHHA has determined that no reasonable alternative considered by
OEHHA, or that has otherwise been identified and brought to the
attention of OEHHA would be more effective in carrying out the purpose
for which the action is proposed or would be as effective and less
burdensome to affected private persons than the proposed action.
AVAILABILITY OF STATEMENT OF REASONS AND TEXT OF PROPOSED
REGULATIONS
(Follow this
link to download the Statement of Reasons as a pdf file)
(Follow
this link to download the text of the Proposed Regulation)
OEHHA has prepared and has available for public review
an Initial Statement of Reasons for the regulation, all the critical
information upon which the regulation is based, and the text of
the regulation. A copy of the initial statement of reasons, a copy
of the text of the regulation and copies of the risk assessments
which were used by OEHHA to determine the NSRLs and MADLs are available
upon request from OEHHA's Proposition 65 Implementation Program
at the address and telephone number indicated above. These documents
are also posted on OEHHA's Web site at www.oehha.ca.gov.
AVAILABILITY OF CHANGED OR MODIFIED TEXT: The full
text of any regulation which is changed or modified from the express
terms of the proposed action will be made available at least 15
days prior to the date on which OEHHA adopts the resulting regulation.
Notice of the comment period on changed regulations and the full
text will be mailed to individuals who testified or submitted oral
or written comments at the public hearing, whose comments were received
by OEHHA during the public comment period, and who request notification
from OEHHA of availability of such change. Copies of the notice
and the changed regulation will also be available at the OEHHA's
Web site at www.oehha.ca.gov.
FINAL STATEMENT OF REASONS
A copy of the final statement of reasons may be obtained,
when it becomes available, from OEHHA's Proposition 65 Implementation
Program at the address and telephone
number indicated above. The final statement of reasons will also
be available at the OEHHA's Web site at www.oehha.ca.gov.
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT
JOAN E. DENTON, Ph.D.
Director
Dated: June 8, 2001
You will need the free program Adobe Acrobat Reader to view or
print PDF files 
For questions regarding Proposition 65, please contact the Cynthia
Oshita in the Proposition 65 Implementation Program
For help with this web site please contact the Web
Mistress
|